"Jesus' Last Prayer"

“Reimagining the Human One(s)”

Daniel 7:13, 12:1-3; Matthew 26:63-64;

Mark 13:22-26; Revelation 1:12-13, 14:14

A sermon preached by the Rev. Douglas M. Donley

April 2, 2006

University Baptist Church

Minneapolis, MN

 

Hear also this contemporary text from Virginia Woolf:

I am going to develop in your presence as fully and freely as I can the train of thought which led me to think this.  Perhaps if I lay bare the ideas, the prejudices, that lie behind this statement you will find that they have some bearing upon the women and some upon fiction.  At any rate, when a subject is highly controversial—and any question about sex is that—one cannot hope to tell the truth.  One can only show how one came to hold whatever opinion one does hold.  One can only give one’s audience the chance of drawing their own conclusions as they observe the limitations, the prejudices, the idiosyncrasies of the speaker. (Room 4; as quoted in Schaberg 2004:257-8)

 

            It’s a tall order to try and follow that challenging liturgical drama of the past month.  Gayla Marty and company fleshed out many of the questions surrounding Mary Magdalene, the church, its hierarchy, its blindness, our complicity in such blindness, the central import of Mary Magdalene in the Biblical record and perhaps even more importantly her impact to many people throughout history and across the world who struggle for meaning.

The task of theology is to be true to our experience of God, to translate that into a sense of how God continues to operate in the world and to figure out how we are to make sense of and operate in this world.  I believe that this whole process of resurrecting Mary Magdalene is part and parcel to recapturing our role alongside God in the creative and redemptive process of resurrecting this sin-sick world. 

Luckily we have companions along this journey.  Like Jane Schaberg we have  the scriptures, Virginia Woolf, the lost gospels, the traditions that surround Mary and glimpses within scripture that point us to something we have perhaps not even considered.  Unlike Jane Schaberg, we have each other. 

We know each other’s joys, our concerns, our longings our stuggles, our triumphs and our tragedies.  Making sense of how the ancient stories intersect with our present realities is what the church is all about.

That’s what I want to focus briefly upon this morning.

You see, the resurrection of Mary Magdalene requires something to arise within each of us. 

Something to break forth. 

Something to brim over like the flooded ruins at Migdal, revealing something new. 

Something to break free of the chains that have bound it up for too long. 

Something emerging from the empty tombs of our faith journeys. 

Something that confounds everything and turns our world upside down.

The resurrection of Mary Magdalene might really be the resurrection of each of us AND the resurrection of the Christian community. 

The resurrection of an apocalyptic sense of commitment and life-giving hope in the midst of a world gone to hell. 

We know full well that we live in apocalyptic times.  I am not saying that the end is near or anything like that, but I am saying that we are dancing perilously close to the edge. 

One needs only look at our use and abuse of natural resources;

our xenophobic fear of the wrong kind of foreigners (read non-Caucasian foreigners);

our propensity to delude ourselves into thinking we can solve our problems by starting war after endless war;

our willingness to sell our collective souls for a dollar or a euro or a yen, no matter what the labor practices are of those with whom we do business;

our propensity to demonize other religions saying that my God is better than your god, which is never a good way to make friends and influence people, and the list goes on.   It’s like a tomb.  Our hope is dashed and sealed away.

We enter into theology with this kind of backdrop.  We don’t shirk from these realities.  And yet we long for something better.  We yearn for something better.  We come to church because we see in the message and in the gathered community a glimpse of a something better.  We are followers of Mary who was the first to deliver the Good News that the tomb is empty.  Hope is set free.  The ultimate power of this world is no match for the power of God embodies in God’s people.

That resurrected community, that community that knows full well the problems with this world and yet takes on the suffering of the world so that we might redeem the world and ourselves in the process.  That is what Jesus was getting at.  And it’s apocalyptic.  It is taking down the structures that we know and reshaping them and molding them into a new future.  It is snubbing our collective noses at the powers and principalities of this world by saying that we have a power greater than ourselves which will restore us to sanity.

Jane Schaberg and Elizabeth Schussler-Fiorenza put it this way, “Jesus did not explicitly attack the power structures that create injustice and oppression, but implicitly subverted them “by envisioning a different future and different human relationships on the grounds that all persons in Israel are created and elected by the gracious goodness of Jesus’ Sophia-God.”” (Schaberg, 2004:261—quoting In Memory of Her by Elizabeth Schussler-Fiorenza, 1994:142)

So what is this subversive power? 

What is its name? 

What is this that can restore us to our true humanity, our true likeness of God? 

What is this that enfolds and inspires and undergirds our movement?

We get a glimpse of it throughout the Gospels.  It is the Human One who will bring this all about.  Very often, this is translated as the Son of Man.   

“You will see the Human One sitting at the right hand of God” (Matthew 26:64);

“Amidst the lampstands one like the Human One clothed in a long white robe with a golden girdle round the breast” (Rev. 1:13)

“You will see the Human One coming in clouds with great power and glory” (Mark 13:26)

All of these seem to come from the apocalyptic vision of Daniel when he wrote:

“I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a Human One…”(Daniel 7:13)

In Daniel, the Human One is not simply a person, it is also a group of people, a movement of people committed to God and having been made new by God’s unique revelation.   The resurrection community can be the Human Ones we long for. 

Daniel’s apocalypse, like Revelation’s relied on people taking a sociopolitical and ethical stand in hope and faith in final justice, if for no other reason than because that is how God works.

Most of Christian theology has said that the Human One is Jesus himself.  And it seems to make some sense, all except for the fact that Jesus never really seemed to be too interested in making such a big deal about who he was or who he wasn’t. 

We get into problems as we try to identify with one person and not a movement.  Jesus was always pointing out there toward the kingdom.  Jesus was pointing out there to the work that needs to be done.  Too much of Christian theology has pointed to the pointer, maybe as an attempt to soften or even diminish the political import of what Jesus was up to.  To equate Jesus alone with the heavenly Human One is to let the rest of us off the hook and absolve us of responsibility.  This seems antithetical to Jesus’ mission.

Mary Magdalene received a mystic message from Jesus.  In all four Gospels, she is there at the cross, the empty tomb and is the first witness to the resurrection.  In fact, she is the first to spread the Gospel.  She is the first to tell of the resurrection.  But oddly she disappears after sharing the good news with the boys.  Her mystical insight may well have been threatening to the emerging church, largely because it emphasized mutuality, equality and it continued the challenge to patriarchy that Jesus began.  This may have been too radical for the emerging church.  Schaberg posits that Christian theology needed to disavow and marginalize Mary Magdalene because she might expose this apocalyptic aspect of the Jesus movement.  

“…the son of Man is “a powerful political symbol…of a specific way of being, living, and hoping embodied by Jesus and his followers.  The Son of Man is an alternative to other symbols of authority, such as the Roman emperor and his agents, the heirs of Herod the Great, and the messianic pretenders who attempted to overthrow Roman rule by force.”  It is a symbol used consistently by the author of Daniel, the Qumran community, the author of Revelation and other writers, teachers and prophets as well as Jesus, none of whom advocated violence, and none of whom was content with accommodation to the status quo.  “All called for resistance to the current unjust order by creating an alternative symbolic universe which sustained an alternative way of life.” (Schaberg, 2004:291 quoting A.Y. Collins’ work Origin of the Designation, p. 158)

“The root of the resurrection faith is an apocalyptic vision of the present reality and future hope of a renewed world free of suffering and death. “Resurrection does not simply spell the survival of the soul but requires the transformation of the world as we know it.””(Schaberg, 2004:302 quoting from Elizabeth Schussler-Fiorenza’s Miriam’s Child, 128)

So if the Human One is not simply an individual in the person of Jesus, but the greatest hope for all of us, the greatest vision for our world, the greatest aspiration for our movement, then every time we feed the hungry, we are doing the incarnational work of the Human One.

Every time we delve deeply into theology with the intent of setting people free, we are doing the work of the Human One.

Every time we say no to a dysfunctional relationship and say yes to honesty and integrity we are part of the communal experience of the Human One.

Every time we give of our time, our talent and our treasure so that the movement of the Human One can continue to thrive and set more people free, then we are doing the work of the Human One.

Every time we say the subversive word, or take the subversive action, every time we refuse collude with injustice, then we are doing the work of the Human One.

Every time we ask the questions why there are some insiders and some outsiders in the church or the school or even our own families, then we are doing the inclusive ultimately egalitarian work of the Human One. 

My friends, we worship, we pray and we work so that the Human One may thrive in the world. 

I see Human Ones right here. 

I see Human Ones who set people free. 

I see Human Ones who will not sit back and let someone walk over someone else.

I see Human Ones who are willing, able, and audacious enough to start a little apocalypse here and there. 

Thank God for you. 

Thank God for this church. 

Thank God that the reimagined movement of the Human Ones is alive and well and willing to set the course for the next revelation of God in the world.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References are from Jane Schaberg’s book The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene: Legends, Apocrypha, and the Christian Testament.  2004.  Continuum Publishing, New York, London.

Back to Recent Sermon Page